Kagisano-Molopo Local Municipality (NW397)

OVERVIEW

Contact Details

Postal: Private Bag X522, Ganyesa, 8613
Physical: Municipal Offices (Next to Ganyesa Health Clinic), Ganyesa
Tel: 053 998 4455
Fax: 053 998 3711
Web: www.kmlm.gov.za

Geography, History and Economy

Area: 23 827km²
Description: Kagisano-Molopo Local Municipality is situated within the Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati District Municipality (previously Bophirima District Municipality) in the North West province. It was created at the local government elections of 18 May 2011 by merging the Kagisano and Molopo Municipalities. It borders on the Kgalagadi District of the Republic of Botswana to the north, Moshaweng Local Municipality in the Northern Cape province to the south-west, Greater Taung Local Municipality to the south, Naledi Local Municipality to the south-east, and Ratlou Local Municipality to the east.
Cities/Towns: Piet Plessis, Pomfret

MANAGEMENT

Political Management

Composition of Council: ANC 24, DA 2, UCDP 2, ACDP 1, COPE 1
Mayor: Ms Kesenkamang V Kekesi
Other Members of Council: K M Namusi (Speaker), K S Moreki (Chief Whip)

Administrative Management

Municipal Manager: Mr Ashmar Khuduge
Chief Financial Officer: Mr O Ntsimane (Acting)
Communications Officer: Mr K E Hetlhogile

DEMOGRAPHIC

Population 105 789
Age Structure
Population under 15 37.60%
Population 15 to 64 56.50%
Population over 65 5.90%
Dependency Ratio
Per 100 (15-64) 77.10
Sex Ratio
Males per 100 females 92.80
Population Growth
Per annum 0.52%
Labour Market
Unemployment rate (official) 30.20%
Youth unemployment rate (official) 15-34 38.80%
Education (aged 20 +)
No schooling 28.60%
Higher education 4.50%
Matric 14.00%
Household Dynamics
Households 28 531
Average household size 3.60
Female headed households 47.80%
Formal dwellings 89.00%
Housing owned 55.40%
Household Services
Flush toilet connected to sewerage 7.50%
Weekly refuse removal 1.00%
Piped water inside dwelling 11.30%
Electricity for lighting 73.80%

Source: Census 2011 Municipal Fact Sheet, published by Statistics South Africa.


FINANCIAL

All values: R'0002013/142012/132011/12
AUDIT OUTCOME n/aDisclaimer of audit opinionDisclaimer of audit opinion
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Property rates1 050-1 212
Service charges---
Investment revenue378-1 748
Transfers recognised - operational27 48368 45970 410
Other own revenue19 7756 9521 005
Total Revenue (excluding capital transfers and contributions)48 68675 41074 376
Employee costs17 8903 75118 304
Remuneration of councillors3 5614 4917 699
Depreciation & asset impairment-45 9204 240
Finance charges---
Materials and bulk purchases--629
Transfers and grants-1 291603
Other expenditure21 86344 18921 124
Total Expenditure43 31599 64152 600
Surplus/(Deficit)5 371(24 231)21 776
Transfers recognised - capital8 000--
Contributions recognised - capital & contributed assets---
Surplus/(Deficit) after capital transfers & contributions13 371(24 231)21 776
Share of surplus/(deficit) of associate---
Surplus/(Deficit) for the year13 371(24 231)21 776
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE & FUNDS SOURCES
Capital expenditure25 968-20 838
Transfers recognised - capital3 587-10 978
Public contributions & donations--9 860
Borrowing---
Internally generated funds22 381--
Total sources of capital funds25 968-20 838
FINANCIAL POSITION
Total current assetsn/a102 13966 894
Total non current assetsn/a759 053144 004
Total current liabilitiesn/a69 17972 923
Total non current liabilitiesn/a-286
Community wealth/Equityn/a792 013137 689
CASH FLOWS
Net cash from (used) operating14 04553 70082 555
Net cash from (used) investing(27 816)-(43 896)
Net cash from (used) financing---
Cash/cash equivalents at the year end3 93753 70050 182
UNAUTHORISED, IRREGULAR, FRUITLESS & WASTEFUL EXPENDITURE
Unauthorised expendituren/a--
Irregular expendituren/a62 7725 419
Fruitless & wasteful expendituren/a805-
SOURCES71 UnauditedS71 AuditedS71 Audited

Note: For information on methodology, sources and definitions please see Sources.


EMPLOYMENT

2012/132011/12
Employment
Employment Costs (R’000) 17 8903 751
Remuneration of councillors (R’000) 3 5614 491
 
Total Employee Positions 91115
Total Vacant Employee Positions 045
Total Vacancy Percentage 0.00%39.13%
 
Managerial Positions - S57 76
Vacant Managerial Positions - S57 02
Managerial Positions - by organogram 814
Vacant Managerial Positions - by organogram 05
Community And Social Service Positions 1117
Vacant Community And Social Service Positions 02
Finance And Administration Positions 5249
Vacant Finance And Administration Positions 020
Electricity Positions 40
Vacant Electricity Positions 00
Enviromental Protection Positions 00
Vacant Enviromental Protection Positions 00
Health Positions 00
Vacant Health Positions 00
Public Safety Positions 00
Vacant Public Safety Positions 00
Road Transport Positions 80
Vacant Road Transport Positions 00
Sport And Recreation Positions 00
Vacant Sport And Recreation Positions 00
Waste Management Positions 00
Vacant Waste Management Positions 00
Waste Water Management Positions 10
Vacant Waste Water Management Positions 00
Water Positions 00
Vacant Water Positions 00
Other Positions 029
Vacant Other Positions 016

Note: For information on methodology, sources and definitions please see Sources.


SERVICE DELIVERY

2012/132011/12
Water
Blue Drop Score n/a
Is the municipality responsible to provide? NoNo
Does the municipality have infrastructure to provide? NoNo
Does the municipality actually provide? NoNo
Is the service outsourced/commercialised? NoNo
Number of households and non-domestic customers to which provided 00
Number of domestic households/delivery points 00
Inside the yard 00
Less than 200m from yard 00
More than 200m from yard 00
Domestic households with access to free basic service 00

Electricity
Is the municipality responsible to provide? YesYes
Does the municipality have infrastructure to provide? NoNo
Does the municipality actually provide? NoNo
Is the service outsourced/commercialised? YesYes
Number of households and non-domestic customers to which provided 28 44228 442
Domestic households with access to free basic service 5 6805 680

Sewerage and Sanitation
Green Drop Score n/a
Is the municipality responsible to provide? NoNo
Does the municipality have infrastructure to provide? NoNo
Does the municipality actually provide? NoNo
Is the service outsourced/commercialised? NoNo
Number of households and non-domestic customers to which provided 00
Number of households using
Flush toilet - public sewerage 00
Flush toilet - septic tank 00
Ventilated pit latrine 00
Bucket system 00
Other 00
Domestic households with access to free basic service 00

Solid Waste Services
Is the municipality responsible to provide? YesYes
Does the municipality have infrastructure to provide? NoNo
Does the municipality actually provide? NoNo
Is the service outsourced/commercialised? NoNo
Number of households and non-domestic customers to which provided 00
Domestic households with access to free basic service 00

Note: For information on methodology, sources and definitions please see Sources.


LINKS/RESOURCES

Audited Financial Statements
AFS 2011/12
MFMA Section 71 – Schedule C
Schedule C 2013/14
Schedule C 2012/13
Schedule C 2011/12

The information in this directory is supplied and/or externally sourced and is also subject to continual change. If you notice any errors or omissions, please contact us at info@municipalities.co.za so that we can correct it.

Blue Drop Scores

The Blue Drop Scores are sourced from the annual Blue Drop Reports published by The Department: Water Affairs. The Municipal Blue Drop Score is a performance indicator of the overall municipal drinking water quality management performance of the relevant municipality. The score relates to not only the quality of the drinking water, but also contains a risk management measure relating to the ability of the responsible authority to sustain the quality of drinking water and also to deal with any incidents that may pose a health risk to the public. The maximum score is 100 and the target of excellence is 95%.

Green Drop Scores

The Green Drop Scores are sourced from the annual Green Drop Reports published by The Department: Water Affairs. The Municipal Green Drop Score is a performance indicator of the overall municipal wastewater business practice and compliance of the relevant municipality. The maximum score is 100.

Close

Financial Audit Outcomes

The objective of an audit of financial statements is to express an opinion on whether the financial statements fairly represent the financial position of the auditee at financial year-end and the results of its operations for the financial year.

The Auditor-General can express one of the following audit opinions:

Clean audit outcome: The financial statements are free from material misstatements (in other words, a financially unqualified audit opinion) and there are no material findings on reporting on performance objectives or non-compliance with legislation.

Financially unqualified with findings: The financial statements contain no material misstatements. Unless the Auditor General expresses a clean audit outcome, findings have been raised on either reporting on predetermined objectives or non-compliance with legislation, or both these aspects.

Qualified audit opinion: The financial statements contain material misstatements in specific amounts, or there is insufficient evidence for the Auditor General to conclude that specific amounts included in the financial statements are not materially misstated.

Adverse audit opinion: The financial statements contain material misstatements that are not confined to specific amounts, or the misstatements represent a substantial portion of the financial statements.

Disclaimer of audit opinion: The auditee provided insufficient evidence in the form of documentation on which to base an audit opinion. The lack of sufficient evidence is not confined to specific amounts, or represents a substantial portion of the information contained in the financial statements.

Close

Resident Queries


Telephone Number Email Address
Accounts
Electricity
Refuse & Waste Removal
Roads
Service Delivery
Water

Close